欺诈消费者行为的认定一以黄某某机动车买卖合同为例代写毕业论|代写论文枪手-代写文章,代写MBA论文,MPA论文,EMBA论文,本科专科毕业论文网

欺诈消费者行为的认定一以黄某某机动车买卖合同为例代写毕业论

来源：www.daxuelw.org 发布时间：2018-11-22

摘要

2015年3月国家工商行政管理总局颁布的《侵害消费者权益行为处罚办法》详细列举了消费交易中欺诈行为的表现形式。在实践中《消法》虽然增加了对欺诈行为的赔偿的规定，但是在对欺诈行为的认定上却没有明确的规定。对此学者们提出了不同的观点，认为在欺诈行为的构成要件是基于民事法律行为主体的意思自治原则的体现。故本文也试图在学者专家们的研究基础上，进一步阐述消费交易中欺诈行为认定的相关问题。

本文结合原告黄某某与被告重庆某汽车经纪公司汽车买卖合同纠纷一案，以欺诈消费者行为的认定为出发点，在第一部分主要陈述了基本案情，并总结出案件的两个争议焦点，在第二部分围绕本案的争议焦点展开论述，最后文章通过对争议焦点的分析，将经营者利用消费者信息不对称地位故意欺诈消费者的行为认定为欺诈，使消费者的合法权益得到法律保护。

关键词：法律硕士论文、欺诈行为、消费者权益、意思表示

Abstract

In March 2015, the state administration for industry and commerce issued Menroach on consumer behavior punishment method'' in the elimination rules on the basis of detailed rules on the consumer transactions form of fraud. Encouraged consumers to fight operator's wrongdoing in consumer transactions. With the improvement of consumer consciousness, consumer fraud dispute case increases. However, in the civil law and the elimination rules of fraud is not consistent. That, in practice, although elimination modification increased the compensation of fraud, on the cognizance of consumer fraud without clear rules. This creates a court decided that differences produces in the process, to the same operator's behavior, the different cognizance. , scholars put forward different points of view, on the constitutive requirements, civil fraud based on the principle of autonomy of civil juristic act subject to protect the other party the equal status of civil legal relationship, the actor's subjective intent elements are identified on the element of fraud. This article is trying to scholars, based on the research of experts, further elaborated consumer transactions that fraud related issues.

Combining with the plaintiff huang a certain with the defendant in chongqing car brokerage contract dispute case, fraud in consumer behaviour as starting point, this article first part mainly stated the basic facts, and summed up the case of two controversial focus. The second part revolves around the case of disputes, in this paper. Through the analysis of the focus of dispute, the operator use of consumer information asymmetry status from commodity information, make the mistake of tempt consumers intention behavior as a fraud. That inspire us to think how to correctly identified fraud of consumer behavior, fill the holes, maintain the legal authority, that the legitimate rights and interests of consumers get legal protection. So this paper has great practical research significance of the topic.

Keywords:Contract fraud ； consumer rights ； The intention expresses